Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724776›Full record

ArticleMedical research archives2025

Predictors of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer in Qualified Individuals.

Liliana Arida-Moody, Sarah Austin, Erika N Hanson, Emerson Delacroix, Erika Koeppe, John D Rice, Matthew Demerath, Shayna Weiner, Jennifer J Griggs, Kenneth Resnicow and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical research archives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Liliana Arida-MoodyRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sarah AustinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Erika N HansonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Emerson DelacroixRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Erika KoeppeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
John D RiceUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Matthew DemerathRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Shayna WeinerRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jennifer J GriggsRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kenneth ResnicowRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Elena M StoffelRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Innovative Approaches to Expand Cancer Genetic Screening and Testing for Patients & Families in a Statewide Oncology Network through Community, State, & Payer PartnershipsU01CA232827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GRIGGS, JENNIFER J, RESNICOW, KEN A. · 2020 to 2020
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Methods: We surveyed individuals in the United States whose personal and/or family history met clinical criteria for genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, we examined demographic and clinical factors associated with self-reported receipt of clinical genetic testing. Results: Of the 1,269 respondents with personal and/or family history meeting clinical criteria for genetic testing, 48.1% reported having undergone clinical genetic testing. Testing uptake varied by cancer type (p<0.05) and was highest among individuals with personal diagnoses of breast (73.9%), ovarian (88.2%), and pancreatic (70.2%) cancers, as compared with prostate cancer (33.6%). Females were significantly more likely than males to have undergone genetic testing (odds ratio, OR, 1.67, CI: 1.17-2.37), and people 70 years or older were less likely to have had testing when compared with those age under 50 (OR 0.33, CI: 0.22-0.48). Individuals who were diagnosed with cancer 15 or more years ago were less likely to have had genetic testing than those with more recent cancer diagnoses (OR 0.47 CI: 0.30-0.74). Individuals who were eligible to receive genetic testing based on their family history of cancer alone were less likely to have had testing than those with a personal cancer diagnosis (OR 0.65, CI: 0.44-0.97). Conclusion: While clinical genetic testing is routinely offered to specific groups of patients at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes (especially those with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancers), uptake remains low among men and among individuals who qualify for genetic testing based on diagnoses of non-gynecologic cancers and/or family history alone. Patient- and clinician-facing interventions are needed to raise awareness of indications for clinical genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Identifiers

PMID42724776
PMCPMC13559554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.