ArticleMedical research archives2025
Predictors of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer in Qualified Individuals.
Article in Medical research archives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction and Methods: We surveyed individuals in the United States whose personal and/or family history met clinical criteria for genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, we examined demographic and clinical factors associated with self-reported receipt of clinical genetic testing. Results: Of the 1,269 respondents with personal and/or family history meeting clinical criteria for genetic testing, 48.1% reported having undergone clinical genetic testing. Testing uptake varied by cancer type (p<0.05) and was highest among individuals with personal diagnoses of breast (73.9%), ovarian (88.2%), and pancreatic (70.2%) cancers, as compared with prostate cancer (33.6%). Females were significantly more likely than males to have undergone genetic testing (odds ratio, OR, 1.67, CI: 1.17-2.37), and people 70 years or older were less likely to have had testing when compared with those age under 50 (OR 0.33, CI: 0.22-0.48). Individuals who were diagnosed with cancer 15 or more years ago were less likely to have had genetic testing than those with more recent cancer diagnoses (OR 0.47 CI: 0.30-0.74). Individuals who were eligible to receive genetic testing based on their family history of cancer alone were less likely to have had testing than those with a personal cancer diagnosis (OR 0.65, CI: 0.44-0.97). Conclusion: While clinical genetic testing is routinely offered to specific groups of patients at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes (especially those with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancers), uptake remains low among men and among individuals who qualify for genetic testing based on diagnoses of non-gynecologic cancers and/or family history alone. Patient- and clinician-facing interventions are needed to raise awareness of indications for clinical genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.