ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Double heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in patients referred to a tertiary cancer genetics clinic in Singapore.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing use of multigene panel testing has led to a rise in the identification of double heterozygous (DH) pathogenic variants in cancer patients, although their frequency and clinical relevance remain poorly characterised, particularly in Asian populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 5,178 patients referred to a tertiary cancer genetics clinic in Singapore. DH pathogenic variants were defined as the presence of two or more distinct pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants identified by multigene panel testing. Clinical, pathological, and family history data were reviewed and analysed using appropriate non-parametric and exact statistical methods. Results: Among 2,802 index patients with available genetic test results, 593 (21.2%) carried at least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. DH pathogenic variants were identified in 21 individuals (0.75%), of which 9 were patients with breast cancer, 10 with non-breast malignancies, and 2 were cancer-free. The frequency of multiple primary cancers was 26.3% in DH variant carriers, 23.3% in single variant carriers, and 16.5% in those with no pathogenic variants. The median ages of first cancer diagnosis were 47, 44, and 48 years. Several DH combinations involved moderate- or low-penetrance genes, and some clinically unsuspected variants were detected only through broad multigene testing. Conclusion: DH pathogenic variants represent a rare subgroup that is increasingly detected through multigene panel testing. Their phenotypic expression is variable, and the influence of additional pathogenic variants remains uncertain. Our findings emphasise the need for tailored genetic evaluation and further research to guide evidence-based management for this complex patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.