Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724750›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2026

Intratumoral and peritumoral-based radiomics for assessment of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer: model development and validation.

Jiale Li, Di Zhang, Xukai Yang, Dalin Zhu, Xiaoxia Zheng, Yanlong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiale LiDepartment of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Xukai YangUniversity of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou, China.
Dalin ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Xiaoxia ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Yanlong WangDepartment of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoperative non-invasive assessment of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is critical for optimizing surgical strategy and risk stratification in breast cancer patients, yet reliable preoperative predictive tools remain insufficient. Current radiomics studies for breast cancer LVI prediction predominantly focus on intratumoral region (ITR) features, while emerging evidence indicates that the peritumoral region (PTR) harbors tumor microenvironmental alterations closely related to tumor invasion and metastasis and possesses unique diagnostic potential. However, existing studies rarely explore the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics features from different peritumoral subregions for breast cancer LVI, and there is no unified consensus on the optimal effective peritumoral expansion range for LVI prediction. This study aimed to explore the predictive value of multi‑range peritumoral MRI radiomics features for LVI in breast cancer and identify the optimal peritumoral margin. Methods: A total of 291 patients with invasive breast carcinoma who received preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) at Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital) between December 2019 and August 2023 were enrolled and divided into training (n=204) and testing (n=87) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from ITR, PTR-5 mm, PTR-10 mm, combined ITR and PTR-5 mm (ITR+PTR-5 mm), and combined ITR and PTR-10 mm (ITR+PTR-10 mm) on preoperative DCE-MRI images. Feature consistency screening, dimensionality reduction, and optimization were sequentially performed via intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), Spearman correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Five radiomics prediction models based on the random forest (RF) algorithm were constructed corresponding to the five feature regions. The predictive performance of each model was comprehensively assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, from which the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated, calibration curve with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The clinically meaningful threshold ranges of model efficacy indicators were further clarified for clinical decision-making reference. Results: The ITR+PTR-5 mm radiomics model yielded the optimal and most stable predictive efficacy with AUC values of 0.920 (training cohort) and 0.794 (test cohort). The calibration curve of this model showed excellent consistency between predicted probabilities and actual observed LVI status. DCA verified that this model provided the highest clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities compared with other models. Conclusions: The DCE-MRI-based ITR+PTR-5 mm radiomics model can serve as a potential noninvasive auxiliary tool for preoperative LVI risk assessment, providing tentative evidence for individualized clinical treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast cancerdynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)intratumorallymphovascular invasion (LVI)peritumoralprognosis

Identifiers

PMID42724750
PMCPMC13559557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.