ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Prediction of postoperative pulmonary infection after video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical pulmonary resection using an interpretable machine learning model.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pulmonary infection (PPI) remains a significant complication after video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical pulmonary resection (VAT-APR). This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for perioperative prediction of PPI using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) integrated with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for patients undergoing VAT-APR. Methods: This retrospective predictive modeling study included 512 patients who underwent VAT-APR between January 2020 and December 2024 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China. Preoperative and intraoperative features were extracted, and the dataset was randomly partitioned into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Five ML algorithms were evaluated, with the LightGBM model selected as optimal. Results: The LightGBM model demonstrated strong discriminative performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.832 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.795-0.869], with an accuracy of 0.781 and an F1-score of 0.710, outperforming five comparator algorithms. Feature importance analysis identified operative time, percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV Conclusions: The interpretable LightGBM-SHAP model provides a robust and transparent approach for perioperative risk assessment of PPI, with potential to inform individualized perioperative management and targeted preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.