ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2026
Estetrol and its implications for contraception, venous thromboembolism, and breast cancer: an integrative review.
Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) provide benefits beyond contraception but are associated with risks such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) and breast cancer. This integrative review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of estetrol (E4)-containing COCs regarding their risk of VTE and breast cancer. The PubMed database was searched for preclinical and clinical studies published through 2025. Data extraction followed a structured protocol, resulting in the inclusion of 15 studies in the review. Available evidence suggests that E4 has limited effects on the liver and the coagulation cascade, in addition to being associated with less breast tissue proliferation compared to other estrogens. However, clinical evidence regarding hard outcomes, including the long-term incidence of VTE and breast cancer, remains limited. Current evidence suggests a promising efficacy and safety profile but remains insufficient to rule out the risks of VTE and breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.