ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Clinical and operational impact of single anesthesia events in the surgical management of early-stage lung cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer causes 160,000 annual deaths in the U.S. Delays of >8 weeks after radiologic detection worsen outcomes: increasing upstaging risk and reducing median survival. This study aimed to evaluate whether single anesthesia events (SAEs), which combine diagnosis (via robotic bronchoscopy) and treatment (via robotic surgery), reduce time to treatment interval (TTI) and cost compared to the standard of care in early-stage lung cancer patients. Methods: Early-stage lung cancer patients who underwent biopsy and resection from October 2021 to August 2024 were identified and grouped by surgical event: SAE Results: Total of 61 patients (42 traditional, 19 SAE) were included. Patient characteristics had no significant difference. Median pathological nodule size (cm) was lower in the SAE cohort (1.5 Conclusions: Compared with the traditional pathway, the more streamlined SAE approach was associated with a significantly shorter TTI without increased direct costs. These findings suggest that SAE may represent an operationally efficient approach to the management of selected patients with early-stage lung cancer, although larger studies are needed to assess quality-of-life benefits and to confirm the clinical & operational implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.