ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Feasibility, reliability, and clinical value of genomic assay on pre-therapeutic biopsy for endocrine receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocrine receptor-positive (ER+) and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) represents approximately 80% of all BCs. Most patients are treated with upfront surgery; however, 15%-30% will develop late recurrences. Genomic assay indication is usually based on postoperative pathological data including histology subtype, tumor size, lymph node status, SBR grade, and Ki67. Performing genomic testing on core needle biopsy specimens prior to surgery may offer several advantages. In this manuscript, we assess the feasibility, reliability, utility, and potential benefits of such genomic analyses performed on core needle biopsies. Several factors may lead to proposing genomic assay analysis on biopsy: (1) optimization of the patient pathway by reducing time to therapeutic decision-making, (2) predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), and (3) refining prognostic assessment to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in patients for whom axillary surgery is not planned. Given the feasibility and reliability of genomic assay on core needle biopsies, it can be suggested that this practice may become more common in the near future. Knowledge of the evolutive risk determined by the result of genomic assay, as well as clinicopathological characteristics, allows more precise personalization of the therapeutic strategy, including the choice between upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy, the selection of systemic treatments, and decision-making in the absence of axillary staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.