Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724553›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2026

Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting neoadjuvant therapy efficacy in breast cancer based on the HALP score.

Jianping Long, Xiaoke Chai, Tao Zhang, Chongyi Wei, Tao Yang, Haicun Zhou, Xiufen Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianping LongDepartment of Breast, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Xiaoke ChaiDepartment of Breast, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Breast, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Chongyi WeiDepartment of Breast, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Tao YangDepartment of Breast, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Haicun ZhouDepartment of Breast, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.
Xiufen MaDepartment of Breast, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Gansu Provincial Central Hospital), Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet (HALP) score is a composite index reflecting patients' immune, nutritional, and inflammatory status, which has been associated with breast cancer prognosis. However, its value in predicting neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) efficacy in the overall breast cancer population remains controversial and understudied. This study aims to explore the relationship between preoperative HALP score and NAT efficacy in breast cancer patients and develop a predictive nomogram. Methods: Clinicopathological data of 314 breast cancer patients who received NAT and mastectomy between January 2013 and November 2024 were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between high-HALP and low-HALP groups. A nomogram was constructed based on multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's performance. Kaplan-Meier curves were applied to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups before and after PSM, as well as between different point stratification groups based on the nomogram. Results: After PSM, 226 patients were included, with 113 in each group. Multivariate Logistic regression confirmed that a low HALP score was an independent negative predictor of pathological complete response (pCR, defined as ypT0/is ypN0) [odds ratio (OR) =0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.92, P=0.03], while positive human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status was an independent positive predictor (OR =5.00, 95% CI: 1.93-12.92, P<0.001). A higher preoperative HALP score was correlated with a greater likelihood of achieving pCR, whereas a low HALP score was associated with a lower pCR rate and poorer long-term prognosis in breast cancer patients. The nomogram integrating HALP score, HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), N stage, and grade showed area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87) in the training cohort and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.66-0.91) in the validation cohort. Notably, only internal validation via random data splitting was conducted in this study, and no external validation was performed. Calibration curves demonstrated good consistency between predicted and actual pCR probabilities, and DCA confirmed favorable clinical utility. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the high-HALP group had significantly better DFS and OS both before and after PSM (all P<0.05), and the low-point group based on nomogram scores had longer DFS and OS (all P<0.05). Conclusions: Preoperative low HALP score is associated with lower pCR rate and poorer prognosis in breast cancer patients. The nomogram based on HALP score combined with PSM provides a reliable tool for predicting NAT efficacy and individualized treatment decision-making in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast cancerhemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet score (HALP score)neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)nomogrampathological complete response (pCR)

Identifiers

PMID42724553
PMCPMC13559661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.