ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
MRI-based radiomics with SHAP interpretation for preoperative prediction of upstaging in ductal carcinoma
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative prediction of upstaging in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is crucial to avoid unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in low-risk patients. We aimed to develop and validate an interpretable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model for this purpose and to systematically compare the predictive value of intratumoral, peritumoral, and habitat-based features. Methods: This retrospective study included 108 women with biopsy-proven DCIS. Radiomics features were extracted from intratumoral and peritumoral regions (2, 4, 6 mm) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Six models (clinical, intratumoral, peritumoral, habitat, feature-fusion, image-fusion) were developed and compared using multiple machine learning classifiers. The best-performing model was validated on an independent test set (n=33). Model interpretability was achieved using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: The image-fusion model integrating intratumoral and 2-mm peritumoral features showed promising performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.892 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.817-0.967] in the training set and 0.864 (95% CI: 0.735-0.992) in the test set. SHAP analysis identified textural heterogeneity as a key predictor. Using predefined radiomics score (Rad-score) thresholds derived from the training set, the high-sensitivity threshold achieved a negative predictive value of 100% (10/10) and the high-specificity threshold achieved a positive predictive value of 61.5% (8/13) in the independent test set. An exploratory ultra-low-risk threshold (Rad-score <0.25) identified a subgroup of 5 out of 33 patients (15.2%) with no upstaging. Conclusions: The proposed MRI-based radiomics model may assist in preoperative risk stratification for DCIS upstaging, but these findings are exploratory and require prospective multicenter validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.