ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains among the most lethal malignancies worldwide, and acquired resistance to targeted therapy limits durable clinical benefit. Apatinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, is used in advanced HCC, but the contribution of the gut microbiota to Apatinib resistance remains incompletely defined. This study aimed to determine whether gut microbiota dysbiosis, particularly loss of Methods: A Hepa1-6 syngeneic subcutaneous HCC model was established in C57BL/6 mice. The apatinib-resistant phenotype was operationally defined by continued tumor growth under apatinib pressure together with an Results: Apatinib-resistant mice showed gut dysbiosis characterized by reduced microbial diversity, distinct beta-diversity clustering, and marked depletion of Akk. Resistant tumors exhibited reduced M1-like and increased M2-like macrophage fractions, together with lower phosphorylation of p65 and IκBα in whole-tumor lysates. Oral live Akk administration restored intestinal Akk abundance, reduced tumor volume and weight, re-established M1-like macrophage polarization, and reactivated tumor-level NF-κB signaling. In BMDMs exposed to apatinib-resistant Hepa1-6-conditioned medium, Akk supernatant and pasteurized Akk partially restored NF-κB phosphorylation and attenuated M2-like transcriptional skewing. Conclusions: Akk depletion accompanies an apatinib-resistant HCC phenotype and Akk-centered microbial modulation may help counteract resistance by reshaping macrophage-associated antitumor immunity. These findings support further validation of Akk-derived signals in community-level microbiome models and clinically relevant HCC settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.