ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in lung cancer: a real-world analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed lung cancer treatment, but clinical trials often miss rare, life-threatening toxicities and safety patterns in complex combinations. Real-world pharmacovigilance is essential to identify toxicity profiles in unselected populations. This study aimed to characterize adverse event reporting patterns associated with ICI monotherapy and ICI-based combination regimens in lung cancer using real-world data. Methods: We analyzed 34,223 adverse event reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (Q1 2016-Q3 2025) for pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and nivolumab and their combinations. Disproportionality analysis, time-to-onset, and stratified analysis were conducted. Results: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors primarily caused endocrine and respiratory toxicities; ipilimumab caused dermatologic and hepatobiliary effects. Stress cardiomyopathy occurred across all agents, with pembrolizumab showed highest disproportionality signal. Males on atezolizumab had 73% lower odds of reported stress cardiomyopathy [odds ratio (OR) =0.27, P<0.01]. Combination-regimen analyses showed heterogeneous reporting profiles. For example, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy was associated with an earlier onset of duodenitis, atezolizumab-bevacizumab-platinum was uniquely associated with duodenal ulcer hemorrhage, and ventricular fibrillation was highlighted in by nivolumab-ipilimumab combination. Conclusions: ICI toxicity is highly regimen-specific and combination therapy was associated with a shorter reported time-to-onset and increased odds of reporting cardiac and gastrointestinal events, informing tailored surveillance strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.