ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Implementation of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery program at a German center: analysis of the first 100 consecutive cases.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is increasingly being implemented in Europe, but data on the early institutional adoption and integration of RATS programs in Germany remain limited. This study describes the implementation of a RATS program at a German thoracic surgery center and evaluates operative characteristics, procedural safety, and temporal changes during the first 100 consecutive cases. Methods: This retrospective study included 100 consecutive RATS procedures performed between July 2024 and January 2025. Procedures included lobectomies, segmentectomies, bisegmentectomies, trisegmentectomies, wedge resections [diagnostic, lung-volume-reduction surgery (LVRS) and pneumothorax], and mediastinal tumor resections. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used as an exploratory tool to assess temporal changes in total operative time, console time, and docking time during program implementation. Phase comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The 100 patients had a median age of 70 years (range, 39-87 years); 58% were male. Median total operative time was 100 min, median console time 80 min, and median docking time 12 min. The conversion rate was 5.0% and the intraoperative complication rate 3.0%. CUSUM analysis demonstrated a temporal inflection point around case 36 for total operative time and around case 31 for docking time. Docking time decreased significantly from Phase I to Phase II (median 15.5 Conclusions: The first 100 consecutive RATS procedures at our institution demonstrate that implementation of a robotic thoracic surgery program in a German thoracic surgery center is feasible and can be performed with acceptable operative outcomes, a low conversion rate, and a low incidence of intraoperative complications. Temporal improvements were observed particularly in docking performance, suggesting progressive team-based adaptation to the robotic workflow. Because of procedural heterogeneity and the exploratory nature of the analysis, the present findings should be interpreted primarily as an evaluation of program implementation rather than as a definitive determination of a learning threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.