ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Pathomics-based machine learning models for predicting METTL5 expression and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: METTL5, an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methyltransferase, has been implicated in tumor progression, but its prognostic value and non-invasive prediction in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unclear. This study aimed to develop a pathomics-based machine learning model to predict METTL5 expression from histopathological images and evaluate its prognostic significance in LUAD. Methods: A total of 327 LUAD patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with matched hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides, transcriptomic, and clinical data were included and randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3). Quantitative histopathological features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Feature selection was performed via maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) and recursive feature elimination (RFE), followed by construction of a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model. A pathomics score (PS) was generated to assess prognostic relevance. Survival analyses, gene set variation analysis (GSVA), tumor mutational burden (TMB), immune infiltration analysis, and in vitro functional assays were conducted. Results: METTL5 overexpression was independently associated with poor overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) =1.637, P=0.007]. The model achieved good predictive performance [area under the curve (AUC) =0.847 in the training set and 0.752 in the validation set]. High PS was significantly associated with worse survival and remained an independent prognostic factor (HR =1.563, P=0.03). Elevated PS correlated with altered metabolic pathways, increased TMB, and immune microenvironment changes. METTL5 knockdown reduced proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in A549 cells. Conclusions: The pathomics-based model accurately predicts METTL5 expression and provides prognostic stratification in LUAD, supporting its potential as a practical imaging-derived biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.