ReviewBrain communications2026
A meta-analysis of periodic and aperiodic electrophysiological features in Parkinson's disease.
Review in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroencephalography-Based Clustering Reveals Robust Neurophysiological Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- A Canonical Neural Map and Its Deviations Shape Parkinson's Disease Phenotypes.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease is characterized by a range of motor and non-motor changes that can negatively impact quality of life. Many studies have identified potential clinical electrophysiological correlates of Parkinson's disease with an aim of developing new methods of identifying at-risk patients and forming the basis of therapeutic interventions. However, these studies do not present consistent results, and a formal meta-analysis is warranted to identify reliable EEG or magnetoencephalography (M/EEG) characteristics across datasets. In this meta-analysis of open-access M/EEG datasets (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.