Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724381›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2026

Sample Size Determination for Pilot Studies Based on Event Thresholds: A Framework for Evaluating Feasibility of Research Processes.

Mohamad Adam Bujang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohamad Adam BujangClinical Research Centre, National Institutes of Health, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6231-4062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pilot studies are essential for assessing feasibility and operational processes before large-scale research. This study presents a Poisson-based framework for determining the minimum pilot sample size based on discrete event thresholds. Methods: The number of events represents occurrences such as errors, deviations, or missing data that indicate whether a process is functioning as intended. Setting a maximum tolerable threshold for these events provides a clear decision rule for proceeding or refining study procedures. A Poisson-based model was applied for sample size calculation. Results: Based on α ≤ 0.05, the findings show that sample sizes vary depending on the study conditions, namely the maximum tolerable threshold and event rate. Sample size increases with the number of thresholds, while other parameters remain fixed. When α ≤ 0.05, sample sizes ranging from 12 to 26 are generally sufficient for studies involving three to five maximum tolerable thresholds, assuming an event rate of 10.0%. Larger sample sizes may be necessary when a greater number of thresholds are involved or when the acceptable event rate is low. Conclusions: The framework of sample size determination facilitates the early identification of potential issues and supports informed decision-making prior to conducting a full-scale study. In general, a sample size of 25 to 30 units is considered adequate for a pilot study, consistent with existing literature. However, larger sample sizes may be necessary when a greater number of thresholds are involved or when the acceptable event rate is low.

Indexed as

Feasibilitypilot studyPoissonresearch designsample size

Identifiers

PMID42724381
PMCPMC13558988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.