Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724361›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026

Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.

Kun Liu, Jingxiang Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kun LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jingxiang WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-9668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Thoracic anesthesia has recently made key progress in lung-protective ventilation, airway management, and perioperative care. This review synthesizes developments including electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) optimization during one-lung ventilation (OLV), electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for bronchial blocker placement, enhanced recovery protocols with opioid-sparing approaches, and artificial intelligence (AI) applications in closed-loop anesthesia and airway assessment. Within these, we also discuss cross-cutting domains such as perioperative organ protection (neurocognitive dysfunction, immunological considerations, emerging technologies) as they underpin each major theme. Methods: We searched PubMed and Web of Science for thoracic anesthesia, OLV, airway management, enhanced recovery, total intravenous anesthesia, and AI applications. The search covered January 2025 to May 2026 and was limited to English-language publications. Clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and consensus statements were included based on relevance. Study selection was performed by two authors independently, and disagreements were resolved by discussion. The thematic domains (lung-protective ventilation, airway management, enhanced recovery, AI-guided control, organ protection, emerging technologies) were predefined based on clinical relevance. A total of 71 references were included in this review. Key Content and Findings: Individualized lung-protective ventilation strategies, particularly EIT-guided PEEP titration, may improve ventilation distribution but remain limited by hemodynamic trade-offs. Advances in airway management include navigation-assisted bronchial blocker placement and AI-based difficult airway prediction, though external validation is limited. Enhanced recovery approaches emphasize opioid-sparing anesthesia, regional techniques, and selected non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery. AI-guided closed-loop anesthesia shows promise but faces regulatory and implementation barriers. Conclusions: For the practicing thoracic anesthesiologist, key takeaways include: (I) individualized PEEP titration guided by EIT or dynamic compliance, where available, may improve ventilation distribution; (II) AI-assisted airway assessment should be viewed as an adjunct to clinical judgment, not a replacement; (III) non-intubated techniques and opioid-free anesthesia require careful patient selection and are not yet generalizable to routine practice. Clinical judgment and evidence-based tailoring remain essential.

Indexed as

airway managementartificial intelligence (AI)enhanced recoveryone-lung ventilation (OLV)Thoracic anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42724361
PMCPMC13559422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.