ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026
A seven-variable clinical prediction model for bone metastasis at initial diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decisions about bone-imaging workup at initial diagnosis of prostate cancer often have to be made before PSMA-PET/CT or other specialized investigations are available, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Many recent prediction models rely on advanced imaging, radiomics, specialized biomarkers, or large registry infrastructures and may therefore be difficult to apply in this earlier decision context. We retrospectively reviewed records of 291 consecutive men with newly diagnosed, histopathologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between March 2011 and November 2023. Starting from 93 candidate predictors, we applied a five-stage hybrid selection procedure (univariable screening, exploratory LASSO, clinical prescreening, data-quality review, and confirmatory LASSO) to derive the final variable set. The retained predictors were entered into a multivariable logistic regression and visualized as a nomogram. Model behavior was characterized through discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, and 1,000-iteration bootstrap optimism correction. Of the 291 patients, 113 (38.8%) had bone metastasis. The final 7-variable model included anemia status, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, age, Gleason score (three groups), and total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA). The apparent AUC was 0.736 (95% CI 0.674-0.799); the bootstrap bias-corrected AUC was 0.713 with a calibration slope of 0.933. This seven-variable model uses routinely available variables and showed moderate discrimination with stable calibration; external validation in independent samples is required before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.