ArticleHealth care science2026
Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Fungal Infection Prediction: A Real-World Study.
Article in Health care science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Fungal Infection Prediction: A Real-World Study.Health care science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fungal infections (FIs) are common and severe complications in hospitalized patients, with early identification of high-risk patients being critical for improving clinical outcomes. Although previous studies have attempted to predict FI using traditional methods, the accuracy and clinical applicability of existing models still need improvement. The aim of this study is to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting FI risk in hospitalized patients, enhancing the precision of clinical decision-making. Methods: We utilized real-world inpatient data from Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, random forest, and support vector machine recursive feature elimination methods. We then developed ML models, including logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine, K-nearest neighbors and histogram gradient boosting trees, which were validated on both the training set and an internal testing set. During the model development process, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAPs) method was employed to enhance the clinical interpretability of the models. Additionally, an online prediction tool based on Streamlit was developed, integrating the model into the clinical workflow. Results: The study cohort comprised 806,761 hospitalized patients after data cleaning. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two cohorts ( Conclusions: This study successfully developed and validated a ML-based model for FI prediction, demonstrating good predictive accuracy and strong clinical interpretability. Given its performance characteristics, the model is well-suited for targeted clinical scenarios where confirming high-risk patients is the priority, rather than for broad universal screening. Within this appropriate context, the model can assist clinicians in early identification of high-risk patients and in making personalized intervention decisions, holding significant clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.