ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Prevention and management of pulmonary vascular complications in anatomic lung resections: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Pulmonary artery (PA) injury during anatomic lung resection remains a rare but potentially catastrophic complication. With the increasing adoption of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), the absence of tactile feedback and the growing use of neoadjuvant therapies introduce unique challenges. This review aims to summarize the epidemiology, risk factors, prevention strategies, and intraoperative management of vascular injuries in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was performed, with inclusion of English-language studies between 2005 and 2026 focusing on studies evaluating intraoperative vascular complications during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and RATS lung resections. Emphasis was placed on reported incidence, risk factors, perioperative outcomes, and technical strategies for prevention and management. Exclusion criteria included preprints and studies without mention of vascular injury or anatomic lung resection. Key Content and Findings: The incidence of PA injury during minimally invasive lung resection remains low, with reported rates ranging from 1.5-2.9% for VATS and 0.5-2.6% for RATS. Identified risk factors include upper lobe resections, left-sided tumors, bulky or calcified lymphadenopathy, prior thoracic surgery, pleural adhesions, advanced tumor stage, squamous histology, and use of neoadjuvant therapy. Preventative strategies include detailed preoperative planning with three-dimensional computed tomography and careful dissection informed by bronchovascular anatomy. Intraoperative management is multifactorial and relies on adherence to the "four P's": poise, pressure, preparedness, and proximal control. While many injuries can be managed minimally invasively, prompt conversion to thoracotomy remains critical when hemostasis cannot be achieved safely. Conclusions: PA injuries during lung resection require a high level of surgical awareness, preparation, and technical proficiency. As the use of RATS and induction therapies continues to expand, structured strategies for prevention and management are essential to maintain patient safety and optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.