ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
International variability in pain management for the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a survey by the Chest Wall International Group.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum correction is often accompanied by severe postoperative pain. Several analgesic techniques have been researched; however, a consensus on the optimal strategy has not been reached. This survey aims to quantify the international variability in perioperative pain management following the Nuss procedure. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was designed using Qualtrics XM and distributed via the Chest Wall International Group (CWIG), the world's largest medical association for chest wall deformities. Medical specialists directly involved in the treatment of pectus excavatum were included. Demographics and views on the use of various analgesic techniques were collected. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS (v27.0). The index of qualitative variation (IQV) was calculated to quantify variability in responses. Results: The analysis included 71 participants from across Europe (47%), North America (28%), South America (13%), Asia (9%), Australia (3%), and Africa (1%). Of these participants, 70% had >10 years of experience with the Nuss procedure. Participants using standardized pain management (n=64) showed a high global variance in primary analgesic technique (IQV 0.86). A continental sub-analysis solely showed a low variance in North America (IQV 0.14) with a preference towards intercostal nerve cryoablation (94%). Most participants used additional analgesic techniques (89%) in their standardized protocol. Conclusions: These findings revealed high international variability in pain management following the Nuss procedure. Nevertheless, results did suggest a global agreement on a multimodal approach. Future research should focus on providing high-quality evidence on the optimal technique to reduce variability in perioperative pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.