ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Evaluation of the Effect of Adding Various Polymeric Rheological Agents on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Calcium Silicate Cement.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The effect of polymer addition on the properties of calcium silicate cement (CSC) was evaluated. Materials and Methods: The powder component was based on calcium silicate. The liquid component contained distilled water (control group) and distilled water with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and polycarboxylate ether (PCE) polymers separately or in combination (PVA + PCE, PVP + PCE) at concentrations of 1 and 3 wt%. In addition to the evaluation of handling properties, some analyses were performed, including setting time, compressive strength, flowability, and injectability. The best-performing groups were selected as the final groups. The specimens were immersed in distilled water and simulated body fluid (SBF) for 1 and 7 days to evaluate the amount of calcium ion release, weight changes, and hydroxyapatite formation. One-way ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA, and Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Results: Based on the handling evaluation and the results of the setting time, compressive strength, flowability, and injectability analyses, the PVA 3% and PVP 3% groups were selected as the optimal groups and subjected to further analysis. The PVA 3% group showed the highest calcium ion release after 1 day of immersion, while no significant difference was observed among the groups on the seventh day. All three groups (PVA 3 wt%, PVP 3 wt%, and control) showed the formation of calcium phosphate deposits after immersion in SBF. Conclusion: The use of PVA 3% and PVP 3% polymers separately in the liquid component of CSC improved the properties of this cement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.