ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026
Clinical and MRI features for predicting maximum cancer involvement of >50% in a single biopsy core among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at initial systematic biopsy: a machine learning study.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the conditional predictive value of prebiopsy clinical variables and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for maximum cancer involvement of >50% in a single biopsy core among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at initial systematic biopsy and to compare the internally validated performance of different machine learning models.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at initial systematic biopsy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University between April 2023 and February 2026. Clinical, imaging, and combined models were developed to predict maximum cancer involvement of >50% in a single biopsy core using age, body mass index, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), prostate volume, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, and MRI features related to tumor extent. Logistic regression, elastic net, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were compared using the combined predictors. Discrimination, calibration, and overall prediction error were evaluated using five repeats of stratified five-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling.
resultsAmong 127 patients, 85 (66.9%) had maximum cancer involvement of >50% in a single biopsy core. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of the clinical, imaging, and combined models were 0.822, 0.773, and 0.823, respectively. The combined model showed no clear incremental discrimination over the clinical model but had a lower overall prediction error than the imaging model. Among the four algorithms using the combined predictors, elastic net achieved the highest AUROC (0.823), whereas XGBoost achieved the highest average precision (0.878), the lowest Brier score (0.151), and favorable calibration. tPSA and PI-RADS score showed relatively consistent predictive contributions across models. Sensitivity analyses yielded generally similar AUROCs, although Brier scores and calibration slopes varied.
conclusionPrebiopsy clinical variables and MRI features enabled risk stratification for maximum cancer involvement of >50% in a single biopsy core among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at initial systematic biopsy. Elastic net and XGBoost demonstrated favorable overall predictive performance, while tPSA and PI-RADS score showed relatively consistent contributions. External validation in independent cohorts is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.