Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724240›Full record

ArticleTSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen2026

[Working across sectors and with citizens to create a healthy living environment: what works, why, and in what context].

Samantha Elkhuizen, Annelot van Rooij, Marja de Jong, Floor Leeferink, Suzanne Prins, Kristina Thompson, Henk Broekhuizen, Annemarie Wagemakers

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha ElkhuizenLeerstoelgroep Gezondheid en Maatschappij, Departement Sociale Wetenschappen, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Nederland.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-4318
Annelot van RooijTeam Beleidsadvies & Onderzoek, GGD IJsselland, Zwolle, Nederland.
Marja de JongHolten, Nederland.
Floor LeeferinkTeam Epidemiologie, Gezondheidsbevordering en Beleidsadvisering, GGD Twente, Enschede, Nederland.
Suzanne PrinsTeam Epidemiologie, Gezondheidsbevordering en Beleidsadvisering, GGD Twente, Enschede, Nederland.
Kristina ThompsonLeerstoelgroep Gezondheid en Maatschappij, Departement Sociale Wetenschappen, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Nederland.
Henk BroekhuizenTeam Epidemiologie, Gezondheidsbevordering en Beleidsadvisering, GGD Twente, Enschede, Nederland.
Annemarie WagemakersLeerstoelgroep Gezondheid en Maatschappij, Departement Sociale Wetenschappen, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Nederland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Promoting a healthy living environment requires cross-sector collaboration between governments, social organizations, and citizens. The factors influencing cross-sectoral collaboration and citizen participation are generally well known. Less well known is how these factors work and in what context, such as priority neighborhoods. This study explores the effective factors for cross-sector collaboration with citizen participation in priority neighborhoods. Methods: We combined participatory action research with realist evaluation in three Dutch neighborhoods, in both rural and urban municipalities named X, Y and Z in the east of the Netherlands. Data collection included document analysis ( Results: Six effective elements for cross-sector collaboration with citizen participation are: 1) room for cross-sectoral collaboration and citizen participation, 2) cross-domain facilitators and key figures from the neighborhood as health brokers, 3) personal contact and presence in the neighborhood, 4) equity and expectation management, 5) open and regular communication, and 6) visible results.We have experienced that the design of the study as a learning process, facilitated by an action researcher and local process guidance, contributes to sustainable relationships, local impact, and joint ownership. Conclusion: To effectively shape cross-sectoral collaboration that involves citizen participation in priority neighborhoods, it is important to create opportunities for learning processes, bridging roles, relationship-building, and local perspectives.

Indexed as

Citizen participationCross-sector collaborationHealth inequalitiesHealth promotionHealthy living environment

Identifiers

PMID42724240
PMCPMC13558370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.