ArticleEngineering with computers2026
Discovering the mechanics of ultra-low density elastomeric foams in elite-level racing shoes.
Article in Engineering with computers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-low-density elastomeric foams enable lightweight systems that combine high compliance with efficient energy return. Their mechanical response is inherently complex, characterized by high compressibility, nonlinear elasticity, and microstructural heterogeneity. In high-performance racing shoes, these foams are critical for low weight, high cushioning, and efficient energy return; yet, their constitutive behavior remains difficult to model and poorly understood. Here we integrate mechanical testing and machine learning to discover the mechanics of two ultra-low density elastomeric polymeric foams used in elite-level racing shoes. Across uniaxial tension, confined and unconfined compression, and simple shear, both foams exhibit pronounced tension-compression asymmetry, negligible lateral deformation consistent with an effective Poisson's ratio close to zero, and low hysteresis indicative of an efficient energy return. Quantitatively, at a strain rate of 0.25/s, both foams provide a similar compressive stiffness (E = 268±16 kPa vs. E = 299±29 kPa), while one foam exhibits a 42% higher tensile stiffness (E = 884±69 kPa vs. E = 623±96 kPa), and nearly double the shear stiffness (G = 219±20 kPa vs. G = 117±24 kPa), implying a substantially greater lateral stiffness at a comparable vertical energy return (83.3±1.5% vs. 88.9±1.8%). By integrating these data into constitutive neural networks, paired with sparse regression, we discover compact, interpretable single-invariant models-supplemented by mixed-invariant or principal-stretch based terms-that capture the unique signature of the foams with [Formula: see text] values close to one across all loading modes. From a human performance perspective, these models have the potential to improve gait-level simulations with high-performance racing shoes to quantify running economy, performance enhancements, and injury risks on an individual athlete level. More broadly, this work establishes a scalable and interpretable approach for constitutive modeling of highly compressible, ultra-light elastomeric foams with applications to wearable technologies, soft robotics, and energy-efficient mobility systems. Source code, data, and examples are available at https://github.com/LivingMatterLab/CANN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.