ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2026
Abdominopelvic hydatid disease during pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature.
Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the available literature on abdominopelvic cystic echinococcosis (CE) during pregnancy, focusing on clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, management strategies, and maternal and foetal outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting abdominopelvic hydatid disease in pregnant women were included without restrictions on study design or geography. Results: Fifty-one studies (45 case reports and 6 case series) including 79 patients were analysed. The mean maternal age was 28 years (range 15-42). Most patients with reported clinical-presentation data were symptomatic (56/67, 83.6%), commonly presenting with right upper quadrant or nonspecific abdominal pain. Ultrasound was the primary diagnostic modality (50/52, 96.1%), while MRI was used in selected cases. The liver was the most frequently involved site (50/72, 69.4%), followed by pelvic and adnexal locations. Surgical intervention was performed in 38.5% of cases, conservative management in 30.8%, and cyst aspiration in 14.1%. Surgery was often timed during caesarean section or the second trimester. Benzimidazole therapy was administered to 31 patients, most commonly during pregnancy. Caesarean delivery occurred in 43.3% and vaginal delivery in 34.3% of cases. Adverse pregnancy outcomes included miscarriage (4.5%), termination of pregnancy (3.0%), one maternal death (1.5%), and one neonatal death (1.5%). Among the 36 pregnancies with reported gestational age at delivery, 13 (36.1%) resulted in preterm birth. Conclusion: Abdominopelvic CE during pregnancy is rare and clinically challenging, with substantial heterogeneity in presentation and management across the published literature. Given the limited available evidence, management should be individualised within a multidisciplinary team, while prospective international registries are needed to strengthen the evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.