ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026
Development of a machine learning-based assistive diagnostic model for Epstein‑Barr virus‑associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in pediatric patients.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with evolving Epstein‑Barr virus‑associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (EBV-HLH) often do not fully meet the established HLH‑2004 diagnostic criteria at admission, making timely identification of progressors challenging and increasing the risk of poor outcomes. We aimed to develop an internally evaluated, interpretable assistive diagnostic model using routine admission parameters to differentiate EBV-HLH from uncomplicated EBV infection early. The model was compared against multiple machine learning classifiers, interpreted via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, and deployed as a web‑based research prototype to support clinical reasoning before full diagnostic criteria are formally met. Methods: A retrospective case-control study collected clinical and laboratory data from 244 pediatric inpatients with active EBV infection (Xi'an Children's Hospital, 2021-2025). HLH was diagnosed according to the HLH-2004 criteria (fulfilling ≥5 of 8 criteria). This study employed a time-matched case-control design, in which children with EBV-HLH were matched 1:3 with children with uncomplicated EBV infection based on the diagnosis date ±3 calendar days, then randomly split into training (171 cases) and validation (73 cases) sets at a 7:3 ratio. Significant univariate variables underwent least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and Boruta feature selection. The final set of variables was analyzed using six machine learning classifiers-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), naive Bayes (NB), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and LASSO-with hyperparameters optimized for each. The best model was visualized via SHAP and deployed as a Shiny web calculator for individual use. Results: The study population had a median age of 6.4 years (interquartile range: 4.8-9.6) and 48.3% were male. Triglyceride (TG), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), serum ferritin (FE), platelet count (PLT), and the CD4 Conclusions: This work identified five key biomarkers for early differential identification of EBV-HLH in pediatric patients. The RF model showed promising internal discriminative ability, and SHAP confirmed its interpretability via individual‑level feature visualization. Due to the limitations of a single-center retrospective study design and the lack of external validation, this model is a preliminary exploratory tool and requires further validation in multicenter prospective cohorts before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.