ArticleSAGE open nursing
Effectiveness of a Thirst Relief Program in Reducing Thirst Intensity and Distress Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thirst is a common and distressing symptom among patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) but is often overlooked because of its subjective nature and patients' limited ability to communicate discomfort. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured nurse-led thirst relief program in reducing thirst intensity and thirst-related distress among ICU patients. Method: A two-group randomized controlled trial was conducted in the medical, surgical, and neurological ICUs of Qaem and Imam Reza hospitals, Mashhad. Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 41) or the control group (n = 41). The intervention group received a structured thirst relief program from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., including cold water spray, moist oral swabs, and 0.1% menthol lip application. Thirst intensity was assessed every two hours using a Numeric Rating Scale, and thirst-related distress was measured before and after the intervention using the Thirst Distress Scale for Heart Failure. The control group received routine ICU care. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. Thirst intensity decreased in both groups but was significantly lower in the intervention group at 8:00 p.m. (median 6.0 [Q1-Q3: 5.0-7.0] vs. 6.0 [6.0-7.0], p = 0.035). Post-intervention thirst distress was also significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (15.8 ± 4.1 vs. 23.7 ± 3.7, p < 0.001), with a greater mean reduction in thirst distress (9.9 ± 4.5 vs. 2.5 ± 2.1, p < 0.001). Conclusions: A structured nurse-led thirst relief program effectively reduced both thirst intensity and thirst-related distress among ICU patients. Given its simplicity, low cost, and non-invasive nature, this intervention can be integrated into routine ICU nursing care to improve patient comfort. Further multicenter studies are warranted to confirm its long-term effectiveness across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.