ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Nuances of perioperative lung isolation and airway management.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective lung isolation is fundamental to safe anatomical lung resection. This review examines practical techniques for achieving lung separation with double-lumen tubes (DLTs) and bronchial blockers (BBs), weighing the risks and benefits of each approach, and synthesizes the physiological principles and intraoperative considerations that govern one-lung ventilation (OLV). DLTs offer rapid and reliable lung separation, available suctioning and suction-guided lung collapse, and straightforward conversion between one- and two-lung ventilation, making them well suited to many adult thoracic procedures; however, their larger external diameter and stiffness increase the risk of trauma. BBs permit lung isolation through a single-lumen endotracheal tube, have a smaller airway footprint, facilitate pediatric lung isolation in smaller patients, and allow for postoperative ventilation without tube exchange, but they may provide slower or less complete lung collapse. Device choice should be individualized based on patient anatomy, surgical requirements, airway difficulty, and operator experience. Physiologically, OLV converts a portion of the pulmonary circulation into a shunt and can increase pulmonary vascular resistance; these effects make lung-protective ventilation strategies prudent with low tidal volumes, cautious positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung, and limited driving pressures. Intraoperative management prioritizes early confirmation of device position with bronchoscopy, proactive strategies for anticipated hypoxemia, close communication between surgical and anesthesia teams, and readiness to troubleshoot ventilation strategies. Meticulous technique, vigilant monitoring, and collaborative operative planning are essential to minimize complications and optimize both hemodynamic stability and surgical exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.