ArticleJournal of clinical and translational hepatology2026
Comparative Efficacy of Promising Targets in the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to evaluate treatment efficacy for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 11 promising targets among adults with MASLD. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Embase were searched from inception to November 20, 2024. The primary outcomes were fibrosis improvement ≥1 stage without worsening of steatohepatitis and steatohepatitis resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Additional outcomes included reductions in liver fat content, liver enzymes, metabolic profiles, and selected safety outcomes. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank efficacy. Results: Of 11,584 articles screened, 44 eligible RCTs (11,410 participants, 33 medications) were included. For fibrosis improvement, d-(R)-pioglitazone (SUCRA: 79.3) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 21 analogs (SUCRA: 71.9) ranked higher. For steatohepatitis resolution, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) dual receptor agonists (RAs) (SUCRA: 91.7) ranked higher. Co-agonists of GLP-1/GIP/GCG and GLP-1/GCG receptors ranked higher for relative and absolute changes in liver fat content, respectively. For liver enzymes and glucose improvement, the combination of a GLP-1 RA and an acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitor ranked higher. GLP-1 RAs, peroxisome proliferator-activated RAs, and FGF21 analogs showed favorable effects on lipid profile improvement. Conclusions: Incretin-based co-agonists and FGF21 analogs showed favorable profiles across key endpoints, while d-(R)-pioglitazone and GLP-1/GIP dual RAs ranked higher for fibrosis improvement and steatohepatitis resolution, respectively. SUCRA rankings should be interpreted in conjunction with effect sizes, uncertainty, and available safety data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.