ReviewDigital health
Exploring the use of digital and paper-based patient-held medication lists to improve medication adherence and health outcomes in polypharmacy: A scoping review.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medication non-adherence is a major global healthcare challenge, particularly among adults with polypharmacy. Patient-held medication lists (PHMLs) may empower patients and support better medication adherence. Objectives: To systematically map existing literature on the impact of PHMLs on adherence, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among adults with polypharmacy. Methods: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Three databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, and ProQuest) between 2010 and March 2025. Eligible studies included adults with polypharmacy, evaluating PHMLs in any healthcare setting, and reporting at least one outcome of interest. Results: Thirteen studies were included. Three of seven showed significant improvement in adherence, and two of four reported better glycemic control, improved lipid profiles, or a reduction in hospitalization rates. Patient satisfaction improved in all seven studies assessing it. Three of five studies found significant reductions in medication errors and serious side effects. Conclusion: PHMLs show promise in improving adherence, satisfaction, selected clinical outcomes, and medication safety in polypharmacy, despite mixed results. Further research should assess long-term impacts and scalable implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.