Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724082›Full record

ArticleNarra J2026

Formaldehyde exposure risk assessment among fiberboard furniture manufacturing workers in Thailand: Comparison of TIS 2012 and EPA IRIS standards.

Anamai Thetkathuek, Wanlop Jaidee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Narra J, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anamai ThetkathuekDepartment of Industrial Hygiene and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Wanlop JaideeDepartment of Public Health Foundations, Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formaldehyde exposure in medium-density fiberboard furniture manufacturing is an important occupational health concern because formaldehyde-containing resins can release hazardous airborne emissions during production processes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare formaldehyde exposure risks among furniture manufacturing workers using the Thai Industrial Standard (TIS) 2012 semi-quantitative model and the United States Environmental Protection Agency Integrated Risk Information System (EPA IRIS) quantitative model, and to examine the concordance between the two frameworks. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 439 workers from ten departments in a medium-density fiberboard furniture factory in Chachoengsao Province, Thailand. Work characteristics and health symptoms were collected using structured questionnaires. Full-shift personal air sampling was performed in accordance with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Method 5700, and samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Risk characterization was conducted using TIS 2012 based on exposure rating × health effect rating, while EPA IRIS was applied to estimate non-cancer risk using the hazard quotient and lifetime cancer risk using the inhalation unit risk. Non-cancer and lifetime cancer risks were assessed using HQ and inhalation unit risk. The mean formaldehyde concentration was 5.47 mg/m

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalFormaldehydeInterior Design and FurnishingsManufacturing IndustryOccupational ExposureCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRisk AssessmentThailandUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyWorking ConditionsAir Pollutants, OccupationalFormaldehydeFormaldehydefurniture manufacturingoccupational exposurerisk assessmentTIS 2012

Identifiers

PMID42724082
PMCPMC13558884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.