ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Beyond anxiety and face: strategic silence as instrumental disengagement in a Chinese graduate EAP Reading classroom.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Silence in East Asian English classrooms has traditionally been attributed to "anxiety" and "face." However, these factors may not sufficiently explain silence in our graduate EAP reading classroom where the course was deliberately designed as a four-week intensive module to teach essential academic reading skills while minimizing the burden on students. Yet despite this careful design, silence remained pervasive. This study is to test the hypothesis that silence in this obligatory, condensed EAP situation is a calculated strategy shaped by students' perceived value of the course. Any academic requirement unrelated to their core research direction is perceived as unworthy of substantial time or energy investment. Method: A mixed-method approach was adopted. Survey analysis quantified and evaluated the relative predictive power of Perceived Course Value, Reading Anxiety, and Self-Efficacy on Silence Propensity. Focused group discussion investigated how students themselves rationalize their silence. Results: Reading Anxiety and Perceived Course Value scored a mean of 3.47 (SD = 0.69), 2.80 (SD = 1.05). Both exhibited a positive correlation with Silence Propensity (Perceived Course Value: Discussion: Perceived Course Value was the strongest predictor of Silence Propensity. The non-significant correlation between Self-Efficacy and Silence Propensity is further addressed in the Discussion. The quantitative and qualitative evidence taken together presents a comprehensive depiction of EAP classroom silence, highlighting "rational disengagement" as a key mechanism and providing an alternative interpretation to the traditional diagnostic of "cultural shyness" in this specific EAP context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.