ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
What limits a bystander's action to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation in China? Insights from a cross-sectional study conducted in Shaanxi Province.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rate of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains critically low in China. Identifying the underlying reasons may help reduce mortality from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 572 participants in Shaanxi, China. A researcher-developed questionnaire was used to assess four domains: ability to recognize the need for CPR, willingness to perform CPR, internal concerns about initiating CPR, and actual CPR competence. Subgroup analyses were performed across demographic strata. Willingness and concerns regarding CPR for relatives versus strangers were distinguished and compared. Results: Of the participants, 73.95% demonstrated the ability to recognize the need to perform CPR. Subgroup analysis revealed individuals aged ≥ 50 years, rural residents, and those with lower educational attainment had relatively poorer ability. Regarding willingness to perform CPR, over 94% of participants reported willingness to act for both relatives and strangers. However, the intensity was significantly greater for relatives than for strangers (8.84 ± 2.35 Conclusion: Overall, the following issues should be prioritized. First, lack of confidence in skills-which may stem from poor actual competence-is widely cited. Second, individuals have greater concerns regarding psychological fear, poor physical condition, medical litigation, and sanitary issues when the victim is a stranger. Finally, special attention should be paid to populations characterized by age ≥ 50 years, lower educational level, and rural residence, as they demonstrated a tendency toward poorer performance across all assessed domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.