ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Organization of coping strategies and their proximal associations with pain intensity in spinal pain patients.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although coping strategies are well-established psychological correlates of chronic pain, their relative importance and combined organization in relation to pain intensity remain unclear. Clarifying whether coping strategies act as independent correlates or as an organized system is essential for refining psychosocial assessment and intervention. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 142 adults with spine-related pain in Brescia, Italy completed the Cope-NVI questionnaire, assessing five coping dimensions. A multi-method analytical framework was applied: multiple regression identified independent associations with pain intensity, bootstrap mediation analyses examined indirect associations among coping strategies, and k-means clustering identified person-centered coping profiles. Sensitivity analyses additionally adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Multiple regression identified Avoidance and Positive Attitude as the only coping dimensions independently associated with pain intensity. These associations remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, pain duration, and pain location. Bootstrap mediation analyses indicated that associations of Social Support and Problem Orientation with pain intensity were largely accounted for by indirect associations through Avoidance and Positive Attitude. Cluster analysis identified three clinically interpretable coping profiles: Adaptive Copers (low Avoidance, high Positive Attitude; lowest pain), Moderate Copers, and Maladaptive Copers (high Avoidance, low Positive Attitude; highest pain). Cluster differences were observed primarily in coping characteristics and pain intensity rather than demographic or clinical variables. Conclusions: Coping strategies in spine-related pain appear to be hierarchically organized in relation to pain intensity, with Avoidance and Positive Attitude showing the strongest independent associations. These findings provide a framework for understanding how coping dimensions co-occur within individuals and may help inform psychosocial assessment and person-centered intervention strategies. Given the cross-sectional design, the observed mediation patterns should be interpreted as statistical associations rather than causal mechanisms. Significance: This study clarifies how coping strategies jointly relate to pain intensity in individuals with spine-related pain. Using integrated regression, mediation, and cluster analyses, it identifies Avoidance and Positive Attitude as the coping dimensions most strongly associated with pain severity and demonstrates that coping strategies organize into clinically interpretable profiles. The findings support psychosocial assessment approaches that prioritize maladaptive avoidance and adaptive cognitive coping processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.