Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723967›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Building and evaluating a social prescribing program for carer-employees: an intervention study.

Allison M Williams, Brooke Chmiel, Kate Mulligan, Sarah Neil-Sztramko, Winny Fung, Srija Biswas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allison M WilliamsSchool of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Brooke ChmielSchool of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kate MulliganDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sarah Neil-SztramkoDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Winny FungCanadian Institute for Social Prescribing, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Srija BiswasCanadian Institute for Social Prescribing, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Within a 12-month time window, and in partnership with the Canadian Institute for Social Prescribing (CISP), an extension of the Canadian Red Cross (CRC), we will develop and test a social prescribing (SP) program intervention in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada for Carer-Employees (CEs) - those who balance unpaid care of an adult dependent with paid employment. Given the emergence of SP programs geared towards unpaid carers more broadly, the development of an SP program specific to CEs will provide coordinated access to social and community supports that are unique to the needs of CEs in balancing their dual role. Methods: OBJECTIVE 1: Informed by a recently completed scoping review of SP programs for CEs, the team will work closely with partner organizations, CISP and the CRC, and a Project Advisory Committee (PAC), including CEs with lived experience, to develop an SP program intervention via a co-design approach drawing on design thinking techniques and collective impact initiative backboned by CISP's SP pathway. The SP program will then be used as an intervention to be tested in the province of Ontario, Canada, via OBJECTIVE 2. OBJECTIVE 2: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design, four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles (a problem-solving model for improving the SP intervention program) will refine the implementation characteristics of the developed SP program and explore its impacts on CE health. The intervention(s) will operate as a quasi-experiment, where a quasi-experimental pre-post design will be conducted within each PDSA cycle, allowing the SP intervention to be tested and refined with respect to potential adoption by CEs. Impacts on CEs' health will be determined within each PDSA cycle, specifically on CEs' mental, psychosocial, and physical health. Quantitative and qualitative data will be generated within each cycle to inform refinements to implementation. A wait-list control group will be randomly assigned to ensure that the observed improvements can be attributed to the intervention. Discussion: Given the national reach and scope of CISP and the CRC, their commitment to the present initiative provides the project team with the resources necessary to build an effective SP program for CEs in Ontario, while also establishing sustainability through the expansion of this SP program across Canada. The final SP program will be scaled up to the national level.

Indexed as

carer-employeeshealth and wellbeingintervention researchsequential exploratory mixed methods designsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID42723967
PMCPMC13558187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.