Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723916›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Dating psychological violence among adolescents in a metropolitan region of southeastern Brazil: a school-based study.

Isaura Barros Alves Pinto, Franciele Marabotti Costa Leite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isaura Barros Alves PintoNational Immunization Program Department (DPNI), Ministry of Health (Brazil), Brasília, Brazil.
Franciele Marabotti Costa LeitePostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the prevalence of dating psychological violence among adolescents in the Metropolitan Region of the State of Espírito Santo (ES), Brazil, and its association with socioeconomic and behavioral characteristics and violence experiences. Methods: A cross-sectional and analytical study was conducted with 1,238 adolescents aged 14-19, enrolled in public and private schools in the Greater Vitória Metropolitan Region (ES), Brazil, who were in a romantic relationship at the time of the research. Sampling was by cluster and stratification. The outcome variable was dating psychological violence (yes/no), and the independent variables included sociodemographic characteristics, risk behaviors, and previous violence experiences. Absolute and relative frequencies were calculated. Bivariate analysis used Pearson's chi-square test ( Results: We observed that 18.6% (95% CI: 16.5-20.8) of the participants reported having suffered dating psychological violence. The prevalence was 21.7% among girls and 13.1% among boys. Furthermore, higher frequencies of the problem were observed among non-heterosexual adolescents, those who had had sexual intercourse at some point in their lives, those who smoked cigarettes, as well as those who had suffered bullying ( Conclusion: The findings show that early romantic relationships can involve abusive behaviors linked to social vulnerability and prior violence, highlighting the need for education on recognizing abuse and fostering healthy, respectful relationships.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceAdolescentBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSchoolsSocioeconomic FactorsUrban PopulationYoung Adultadolescent healthdating violenceepidemiologyintimate partner violenceviolence

Identifiers

PMID42723916
PMCPMC13558129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.