ArticleCirculation reports2026
One-Month Outcomes of Aspirin-Free Strategy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With or Without Proton-Pump Inhibitors: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of STOPDAPT-3.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are no previous reports exploring the interaction of proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) on the early effect of aspirin-free strategy compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI. Methods and Results: Among 5,654 patients who were discharged alive within 30 days after randomization in ShorT and OPtimal Duration of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy-3 (STOPDAPT-3), 4,958 patients received PPI prescriptions (PPI subgroup; no-aspirin group, n=2,356; and DAPT group, n=2,602), and 696 patients did not (no-PPI subgroup; no-aspirin group, n=482; and DAPT group, n=214). The co-primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding, and the co-primary cardiovascular endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke. No significant interaction was observed between PPI prescription and antiplatelet regimen on the bleeding endpoint (PPI: hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.22; no-PPI: HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.17-1.54; P interaction=0.34). For the cardiovascular endpoint, there was a lower risk of no aspirin relative to DAPT in the no PPI subgroup (0.41% vs. 3.27%; HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.03-0.60), but not in the PPI subgroup (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.86-1.93) with a significant interaction (P interaction=0.005). Conclusions: There was no interaction for bleeding between PPI prescription and antiplatelet regimen, but a significant interaction for cardiovascular events, requiring cautious interpretation due to the small no-PPI subgroup and baseline imbalances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.