ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A machine learning approach to behavioral signals of burnout in audit and control professions.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burnout is a persistent and growing concern in audit- and control-oriented professions, where prolonged cognitive demands and sustained performance pressure may manifest as observable behavioral withdrawal. This study examines absenteeism as an objective behavioral proxy for burnout and evaluates its determinants using a comparative machine learning framework. Drawing on a real-world human resources dataset, the analysis focuses on a specialized subsample of audit- and control-oriented employees. Multiple regression algorithms were benchmarked, including ordinary least squares, ridge regression, Lasso, Elastic Net, and a nonlinear ensemble method, and model performance was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. Among the evaluated approaches, regularized linear models demonstrated superior robustness, with Elastic Net regression emerging as the most stable and interpretable model under small-sample conditions. The dominance of Elastic Net highlights the importance of combining sparsity and coefficient shrinkage when analyzing organizational data characterized by multicollinearity and limited observations. Nonlinear modeling provided complementary insights but did not outperform regularized linear methods in predictive accuracy. The results indicate that absenteeism in audit-oriented roles is primarily associated with structural and career-stage factors, rather than short-term behavioral fluctuations. This finding suggests that burnout-related withdrawal reflects cumulative role exposure and systemic work design characteristics, rather than episodic stress responses. From a methodological perspective, the study demonstrates the value of regularization-based machine learning for producing transparent and reliable insights in auditing research, thereby addressing long-standing concerns about model interpretability and overfitting. By integrating performance benchmarking with explainable modeling, this research contributes to the emerging literature on explainable artificial intelligence in auditing. In practice, the findings support the development of preventive, system-level interventions aimed at workload structuring and career-stage support to mitigate burnout-driven absenteeism. Despite its exploratory nature, the study offers a rigorous, reproducible analytical framework applicable to similar professional settings with constrained data availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.