Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Reproductive outcomes following assisted reproductive technology after previous caesarean section: data from the Swiss National Registry.

Angela Vidal, Jérémy Levy, Alexandra Kohl Schwartz, Michael von Wolff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela VidalDivision of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Women's University Hospital, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jérémy LevySwiss Society for Reproductive Medicine, Aarau, Switzerland.
Alexandra Kohl SchwartzDepartment of Reproductive Endocrinology, Canton Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Michael von WolffDivision of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Women's University Hospital, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Caesarean section rates have risen worldwide, exceeding the rate of 10%-15% recommended by the WHO. This increase is driven by factors such as advanced maternal age, broader indications for caesarean section (CS), and increased use of assisted reproductive treatment (ART). Previous research, including meta-analyses, suggests that prior CS delivery (CSD) negatively affects the reproductive outcomes in ART, such as lower live birth rates (LBR) and potential subfertility, although the quality of the evidence is variable. Obstetric complications associated with CSD, for instance, uterine rupture and placental abnormalities, highlight the need for further investigation. This study therefore evaluates the impact of CSD on ART outcomes using a comprehensive national registry. Materials and methods: This study includes a cohort of 3,266 women who underwent caesarean section delivery ( Results: The characteristics of the patients in both study groups were similar. Following the first embryo transfer, the clinical pregnancy rates were lower after CSD in univariate analysis (38.7% vs. 43.4%; Conclusions: A history of caesarean section was associated with lower clinical pregnancy rates across successive embryo transfers following ART. No significant association was observed after the first embryo transfer following multivariable adjustment, and miscarriage rates were not affected by the mode of the previous delivery. Further prospective studies, including imaging assessment of caesarean scar defects and isthmocele, are required to determine whether the observed association is related to caesarean section itself or to secondary scar pathology.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRegistriesSwitzerlandARTcaesarean sectionembryo transferpregnancy outcomevaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID42723828
PMCPMC13557996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.