Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723766›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Different Effects of Induced Plant Defense on Population Densities of Specialist and Generalist Insects: An Explanation by Mathematical Modeling.

Suman Chakraborty, Stefan Schuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suman ChakrabortyDepartment of Bioinformatics Matthias Schleiden Institute, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany.
Stefan SchusterDepartment of Bioinformatics Matthias Schleiden Institute, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2828-9355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the wild, plant-insect interactions are highly influenced by plant defense chemicals. These chemicals (or toxins) are usually harmful to attacking insect herbivores, especially generalists. Plant defense is categorized into two types: Constitutive and induced defense. Constitutive defense is present in plants from germination on, while induced defense is activated by biotic stress, such as herbivory, or abiotic stress. This work focuses on modeling the multifaceted ecological roles of defense chemicals and investigates how the community structures of specialists and generalists in an ecosystem are determined by induced defense. The ecological roles of defense are very diverse. Specialist insects are well adapted to plant toxins and thus become less affected than generalists. Specialists are even attracted by the defense chemicals, although both insect groups could be killed at high concentrations. Moreover, natural enemies of insects are recruited by plants through toxins. In this study, these fundamental ecological functions of plant defense are expressed by a deterministic model based on nonautonomous ordinary differential equations. By analyzing this model, we obtain a stable non-zero equilibrium for specialists and a zero equilibrium for generalists at high concentrations of induced defense. Thus, it is proved theoretically that specialists are endemic and generalists are non-endemic in the wild, a common real-world situation, due to the defense induction in plants.

Indexed as

generalist herbivoreglobal stabilityinduced plant defensenatural enemiesnonautonomous ordinary differential equationsspecialist herbivoretritrophic interaction

Identifiers

PMID42723766
PMCPMC13557924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.