Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723756›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026

Development and validation of an interpretable medical deep foundation model for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in early-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective diagnostic study.

Xu Jiang, Qin Peng, Jing Zhang, Alex Zwanenburg, Xin Peng, Chao Luo, Jialiang Ren, Lin Yang, Yajia Gu, Steffen Löck and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xu Jiang *Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qin Peng *Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jing Zhang *Department of Radiology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Alex ZwanenburgOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Xin PengDepartment of Radiology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Chao LuoDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jialiang RenDepartment of Pharmaceuticals Diagnostics, GE HealthCare, Beijing, China.
Lin YangDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yajia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Steffen LöckOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Kunfeng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Meng LiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianwei WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Occult lymph node metastasis (OLM) is common in patients with clinical stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is strongly associated with inferior survival. Accurate preoperative identification of OLM remains challenging using conventional imaging, yet is critical for nodal staging, surgical planning, and individualized treatment decision-making. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable deep foundation model-based approach using preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to predict OLM in early-stage SCLC. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective diagnostic study, 416 surgically treated patients with postoperative pathologically confirmed SCLC and preoperative cT1-2N0M0 status were included. Patients from the largest center were randomly divided into training (n=201) and internal validation (n=86) cohorts, while patients from four additional centers constituted an external test cohort (n=129). Deep imaging features were extracted from preoperative CECT using a cancer-specific pretrained foundation model, and predictive models were constructed using machine-learning classifiers. Model performance was compared with handcrafted radiomics, conventional convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models, and a clinical model. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis. Results: The overall incidence of OLM was 33.9% (141/416). Among the evaluated imaging approaches, the foundation model-derived DFM50N achieved an external test AUC of 0.787 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.703-0.871]. In unadjusted pairwise DeLong comparisons, its AUC was higher than those of RadN and the clinical model (P=0.02 and P=0.02, respectively), whereas no significant difference was observed compared with the combined model (AUC, 0.790; 95% CI: 0.705-0.874; P=0.90). The DFM50N model demonstrated relatively preserved external calibration and provided greater net benefit than strategies of additional staging for all or no patients across a clinically relevant range of threshold probabilities. Model interpretability analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) revealed similar feature-ranking patterns associated with OLM risk across cohorts. Conclusions: An interpretable deep foundation model based on preoperative CECT achieved favorable and stable external performance for the noninvasive prediction of OLM in early-stage SCLC. The model showed favorable discrimination compared with handcrafted radiomics, conventional CNN-based approaches, and clinical assessment alone, and its integration with clinical predictors enabled individualized risk estimation. This approach may facilitate the identification of patients requiring more comprehensive mediastinal evaluation and support more informed multidisciplinary surgical planning and lymph node management.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)foundation modeloccult lymph node metastasis (OLM)radiomicsSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Identifiers

PMID42723756
PMCPMC13557867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.