Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723746›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2025

Greater occipital nerve stimulation for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: A two-stage feasibility and tolerability study.

Liam Kennedy, Ananya Sanagavaram, Elva Arulchelvan, Sven Vanneste, Iracema Leroi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liam KennedyTrinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Leinster, D02 PN40, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2438-0592
Ananya SanagavaramTrinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Leinster, D02 PN40, Ireland.
Elva ArulchelvanTrinity College Dublin School of Psychology, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-3560
Sven VannesteTrinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Leinster, D02 PN40, Ireland.
Iracema LeroiTrinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Leinster, D02 PN40, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective treatments for cognitive impairment in Parkinsons's disease (PD) are needed, with Greater Occipital Nerve Stimulation (GONS) emerging as a potential therapeutic approach. This study aimed to explore PD patients' attitudes toward GONS and assess its safety and tolerability in an open-label field study. Methods: A two-stage study was carried out, comprising an online survey to gather self-reported attitudes from individuals with PD toward GONS as a treatment option, followed by an open-label field study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of GONS in PD-MCI patients. Results: Of 50 survey participants, 86% expressed willingness to try GONS for cognitive impairment. Five participants completed the GONS intervention, which was found to be safe, well-tolerated, and acceptable. Conclusion: People with PD are open to novel interventions for cognitive impairment. GONS was shown to be safe and well-tolerated, warranting further investigation as a potential therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Cognitive impairmentFeasibilityNeuromodulationParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID42723746
PMCPMC13554840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.