ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2026
Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung: integrating molecular landscape, imaging phenotypes, and translational therapeutic strategies.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) of the lung is an uncommon but clinically important subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with distinctive radiologic, histopathologic, and molecular features. Its indolent symptoms, mucin-rich growth pattern, and frequent pneumonia-like or multifocal presentation can obscure early diagnosis and complicate distinction from infection, synchronous primary tumors, and intrapulmonary spread. This review integrates current evidence on the clinical course, imaging phenotypes, diagnostic workflow, histopathologic features, molecular alterations, tumor immune microenvironment, and treatment response patterns of IMA. Emphasis is placed on the relationship between radiologic appearance and underlying mucinous pathology, the clinical significance of spread through air spaces (STAS), and the need for adequate tissue sampling and comprehensive molecular profiling. Compared with non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma, IMA is enriched for KRAS mutations and selected fusion or receptor alterations, whereas canonical EGFR mutations are less frequent. These biological differences help explain why treatment strategies extrapolated from broader non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) populations may be insufficient, particularly for multifocal, pneumonic-type, or advanced disease. Although surgery can provide favorable outcomes in localized disease, systemic therapy remains challenging, and the role of immunotherapy requires further clarification. Future progress will depend on integrated imaging-pathology-genomic models, prospective IMA-specific cohorts, and translational studies aimed at refining classification and developing individualized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.