ArticleREC, interventional cardiology
Design of the LUDICO study: effectiveness and safety of coronary laser in undilatable or uncrossable lesions.
Article in REC, interventional cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07206082 (LUDICO Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
LUDICO Study: Effectiveness and Safety of Coronary Laser in UnDIlatable or unCrOssable Lesions
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is increasingly used in complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in cases of "balloon failure," which includes both uncrossable and undilatable coronary artery lesions. Although these 2 scenarios represent distinct technical and clinical challenges, they are usually evaluated using the same safety and efficacy endpoints. As a result, there is a lack of specific evidence on the safety and efficacy profile of ELCA in each of these situations. Furthermore, the role of intracoronary imaging in optimizing ELCA use remains insufficiently defined. Methods: This will be an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, prospective observational study. Patients with an indication for PCI and undilatable (non-compliant balloon dilatation < 80% at burst pressure) or uncrossable (uncrossable with a "small-profile balloon" with adequate support, left to the operator's discretion) coronary artery lesions treated with ELCA will be included. Intravascular imaging will be highly advised and analyzed in a core laboratory. Device success, angiographical success, procedural success, clinical success and related complications will be evaluated. Patients will be postoperatively followed for 1 year and clinical events will be recorded. Conclusions: The LUDICO study will be a multicentre, prospective study of ELCA therapy in uncrossable or undilatable coronary lesions. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of ELCA in these lesions as well as the clinical results at the 1 year follow-up in this setting. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07206082).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.