Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723705›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2026

Grounded Yet Ascending: Faculty Development in a Time of Reduced Budgets and Travel.

Jeannine Nonaillada, Leigh Ann Holterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeannine NonailladaNew York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, New York, 11501, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-0774
Leigh Ann HoltermanCollege of Medicine, University of Vermont Larner, Burlington, VT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent federal funding cuts have created pauses in admissions, hiring, and execution of research studies at academic medical centers internationally. These monetary reductions have also impacted allowances for non-essential faculty travel. As a result, faculty may now be faced with challenges in how they obtain professional development. Methods: A cross-sectional, exploratory study was implemented to discover the impact of funding cuts on faculty travel for professional development opportunities, as well as strategies medical educators are using to mitigate the current landscape. Results: Findings indicate that faculty now must use alternative methods to obtain professional development and that institutional guidance is lacking in how to do so. Discussion: Authors provide concrete action steps for faculty to take amidst this challenge to remain engaged in professional development.

Indexed as

faculty developmentfaculty engagementmedical educationprofessional development

Identifiers

PMID42723705
PMCPMC13554763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.