ArticleWellcome open research2026
The effect of genetically predicted higher adulthood body mass index on blood pressure traits: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomisation studies.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies have been used to investigate whether higher body mass index causally influences blood pressure outcomes. However, conclusions vary across studies, potentially reflecting differences in risk of bias, populations and analytical methods. This systematic review aims to synthesise MR evidence on the effect of variation in adulthood body mass index (BMI) on blood pressure outcomes. Methods: We will search three databases (Embase, MEDLINE and Science Citation Index). Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and full texts for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted into predefined tables using Microsoft Excel. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence will be assessed using modified risk-of-bias tools and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach (GRADE), respectively. The evidence will then be synthesised and presented in figures and tables, as appropriate. The reporting of this systematic review will follow the PRISMA-2020 guidelines. Anticipated findings: By comparing methods and results and potentially meta-analysing results, we will be able to precisely estimate the magnitude and likelihood of the causal effect of adulthood BMI on blood pressure. As well as examining whether the findings are consistent across studies, we will also determine risk of bias for each exposure-outcome pair. We will establish sources of between study heterogeneity. In subsequent work, this systematic review will be triangulated with evidence from randomised controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.