ArticleF1000Research2026
Market Diversification and Mango Exports in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Peru and Colombia, 2004-2024.
Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Market Diversification and Mango Exports in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Peru and Colombia, 2004-2024.F1000Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within global agri-food trade, mango has become a tropical fruit of strategic relevance. However, export growth is sustainable only when it is supported by diversified markets, competitive stability, and access to destinations with effective purchasing capacity. This study examines market diversification and mango export competitiveness in Peru and Colombia, two emerging economies, during 2004-2024. A quantitative, longitudinal, and non-experimental design was applied using trade data from Trade Map, macroeconomic indicators from the World Bank, geographic distance data from CEPII GeoDist, and information on trade agreements from official sources. The analysis combined export performance indicators, normalized revealed comparative advantage, normalized relative purchasing capacity, the temporal stability of international demand, and a gravity model estimated through EGLS with PCSE correction. The results reveal a clear structural difference between the two countries. Peru increased its mango exports from USD 42.028 million in 2004 to USD 316.986 million in 2024 and maintained positive values of normalized revealed comparative advantage throughout the period. Colombia expanded its exports from USD 806 thousand to USD 15.037 million, although its competitive position became positive only from 2020 onward. The normalized relative purchasing capacity index identified the Netherlands, France, Spain, and the United States as the most important demand markets, while the stability analysis showed greater persistence among importers after 2018. The gravity model indicated that exporter GDP, destination population, and trade agreements were positively associated with exports. Overall, Peru has a consolidated export structure, whereas Colombia remains in an expansion phase and requires greater market diversification and consolidation to strengthen its international export sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.