Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723635›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2026

Faculty-Led Study Abroad Programs and Learning Sustainability: A Southeast Asian Context.

Bama Andika Putra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bama Andika PutraUniversity of Bristol School of Sociology Politics and International Studies, Bristol, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-136X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a widely offered course in International Relations (IR) programs, the teaching and learning of Southeast Asian Regional Dynamics (SARD) struggles to adopt a pedagogical strategy that counters stagnancy and passive learning. The problem is exacerbated when SARD courses discuss topics of sustainability in Southeast Asia, which obligates instructors to introduce complex empirical cases that may be difficult for students to grasp. As a means to ignite the students' interests and allow a platform in which students can see directly the issues that defy sustainable development in the region, this study bridges the conception of experiential learning in SARD courses based on Below, Nydegger, and Parmentier's study on short-term faculty-led study abroad programs, and looks at the prospects of its implementation into SARD courses. To make this argument, this conceptual narrative review explores the following ideas: The intertwining of sustainability and Southeast Asian contexts by exploring academic topics such as haze pollution, climate change, and illegal fishing within the context of Southeast Asia, as well as culturally-sensitive topics; acknowledgement of the instructors' responsibilities within the context of program planning, technical arrangements, and the conduct of program orientations; and establishing active learning students through real-life learning mechanisms that elevate the students' independent learning, research skills, communication skills, and critical thinking.

Indexed as

FacultyLearningProblem-Based LearningSustainable DevelopmentAcademiaAsia, SoutheasternHumansExperiential LearningInternational RelationsPedagogySoutheast AsiaStudy AbroadSustainability

Identifiers

PMID42723635
PMCPMC13554790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.