ArticleJournal of global health2026
Extreme wealth loss and subsequent mental well-being among adults aged ≥50 years: a multicohort study.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The association of extreme wealth loss with subsequent mental well-being in later life, as well as whether this association varies across countries with different levels of economic development, remains unclear. Methods: Our study included 23,817 participants, of which 3282 were from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2018), 11,838 from the Health and Retirement Study (2008-2019), and 8697 from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (2012-2019). Extreme wealth loss in our study is defined as a net wealth decline of 75% or more between the first two waves. Mixed-effects linear regression models were employed to examine the associations. Results: In the fully adjusted models, extreme wealth loss was associated with higher depressive symptoms (odds ratio (OR) = 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-1.4 for China, OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.2-1.3 for USA, and OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0-1.1) for Mexico); lower life satisfaction (OR = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.7-0.9) for China, OR = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.7-0.8) for USA, OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.9-1.0 for Mexico) and worse self-reported health (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.8-0.9 for China, OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.8-0.9 for USA, OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.9-1.1 for Mexico). Predicted standardised scores showed that the negative association between extreme wealth loss and mental well-being remained unchanged over time in China and Mexico. In the USA, we observed a significant interaction between exposure groups and follow-up time. Conclusions: Public health policy formulation should target populations experiencing significant wealth loss and provide them with stable economic security to effectively enhance mental health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.