Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42723450›Full record

ArticleAcute and critical care2026

Rapid microbiological diagnostics for sepsis in critical care: integrating technological advances with antimicrobial stewardship.

Kye-Hyung Kim, Jongyoun Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kye-Hyung KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jongyoun YiMedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.

Funding

Pusan National University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt initiation of targeted antimicrobial therapy is crucial for patient survival. Historically, clinicians have relied on empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics owing to the 48-to-72-hour turnaround time of conventional blood cultures, while traditional host-response biomarkers offer limited pathogen-specific utility. This review highlights the recent paradigm shift in the microbiological diagnostics for sepsis, which is transitioning from conventional methods to rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Pre-analytic considerations for blood culture are of paramount importance as the foundation for all downstream RDT applications. We explore the clinical integration of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and highly multiplexed genotypic assays, which provide rapid species identification and limited profiles of genotypic resistance directly from positive blood cultures. The critical need for rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing is addressed, alongside the emerging technologies for culture-independent microbial detection. Crucially, technological advancement alone is insufficient: the true clinical benefits of RDTs would be achieved only when RDTs are coupled with robust diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship programs. In the context of globally escalating antimicrobial resistance, and with a specific focus on the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms in South Korea, the seamless integration of these advanced diagnostic systems into multidisciplinary clinical workflows underscores the urgency and opportunities of this paradigm shift.

Indexed as

antimicrobial stewardshipbacteremiafungemiamicrobial sensitivity testsmultiplex polymerase chain reactionrapid diagnostic testssepsis

Identifiers

PMID42723450
PMCPMC13575399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.